Copyright
©2012 Baishideng.
World J Psychiatr. Dec 22, 2012; 2(6): 134-147
Published online Dec 22, 2012. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i6.134
Published online Dec 22, 2012. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i6.134
Table 2 Effects of mental and physical stress on platelet reactivity of patients with cardiovascular disease
| Author | Study design | Comorbidities | Medication allowed and health behavior | Stress task and assessment inventory | Sampling | Platelet outcome parameters | Results |
| Markovitz et al[95] 1996 | Hostility and stress task in post MI-patients | Not specified | Sublingual nitro, no calcium-channel blockers or platelet inhibitors for 10 d, NSAIDs for 10 d, no β-blockers for 48 h | Structured Interview Type A behavior and “Potential for Hostility” | Baseline | β-TG | ↑β-TG (P = 0.006) in healthy controls vs post-MI, correlation of ↑levels of Type A and ↑β-TG reactivity (P = 0.02) |
| Post-stress task | |||||||
| Cross-sectional design | |||||||
| 14 stable post-MI vs 15 age matched healthy men | Speech Task | ||||||
| “Cook-Medley Hostility” Scale | |||||||
| BDI | |||||||
| Paffenberger Questionnaire | |||||||
| Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory | |||||||
| Markovitz et al[96] 1998 | Hostility in patients with CHD | Not specified | Sublingual nitro statins, no aspirin/anti-platelet medication for 14 d, no oral or topic nitrates for 48 h, no calcium channel blockers for 48 h, no SSRIs | Type A Structured Interview | Wound incision | Wound induced fibrinogen receptor activation indicators | Relationship between hostility and FbR activation at 2 min and FbR binding at 1 min (P = 0.02) in CHD patients vs healthy controls |
| Cross sectional design | BDI | 1 min after incision | |||||
| 32 non-smoking patients vs 23 non-smoking healthy controls aged 45 to 73 yr | 2 min after incision | ||||||
| FbR activation | |||||||
| FbR binding | |||||||
| FACS | |||||||
| Reid et al[99] 2009 | Acute mental stress in CAD patients requiring coronary angioplasty | Diabetes | Diabetes hypertension, aspirin, ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, topical or oral nitrate statins, clopidogrel | Mental arithmetics | Baseline | GPIIa/IIIb expression | ↑GPIIb/IIIa (P = 0.002), ↑% of MNC bound plt (P = 0.01) and ↑P-sel (P = 0.005) in stress vs baseline, ↑% of plt P-sel (P < 0.01) in stress vs baseline |
| Hypertension | Anger recall | imm post stress | % of MNC bound plt | ||||
| Previous MI | BDI | P-sel expression | |||||
| Cross sectional design | Previous PCI | Maastricht Questionnaire | % of P-sel expression | ||||
| 249 patients (15, 3% women) | STAEI | β-TG | |||||
| Cook-Medley Hostility short-form | FACS | ||||||
| PSS | ELISA | ||||||
| Bacon et al[97] 2006 | Acute mental and acute physical stress in CAD patients with elective cardiological intervention | Hypertension | Aspirin/copidrogrel, ACE-inhibitors, β-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, diuretics, nitrates, statins, antidiabetic medication | Rest 1 8 min Paced Auditory Serial Addition | Rest 1 post task | PF-4 | Mental stress: PF-4 ns changes vs baseline, physical stress: PF-4 ns changes vs baseline |
| Hyperlipidemia | Rest 2 post task | ELISA | |||||
| Diabetes | Rest 2 8 min submaximal exercise test | ||||||
| Cross-sectional design | Smokers | ||||||
| 72 patients (57 men, 15 women) | |||||||
| Strike et al[101] 2006 | Acute stress in male patients with survived ACS | 18 patients withdrawn medication vs 16 patients taking β-blockers, aspirin, statins, ACE inhibitors, no antidepressants | Stroop Colour Word Interference Test | Baseline | PLA | Emotion-trigger group: sig ↑all platelet outcome parameters (P < 0.001) in stress vs baseline vs non-emotion trigger group (P < 0.05), ↑Plt-mo agg at 30 min post stress (P < 0.05) in the emotion trigger group vs baseline vs non emotion trigger group | |
| imm post-stress task | % Plt-mo agg | ||||||
| Cross sectional design | Speech task | 30 min post stress | % Plt-ne agg | ||||
| 14 Emotion trigger group vs 20 non-trigger group | HADS | 75 min post stress | FACS | ||||
| Scale for MI-patients | 120 min post-stress | ||||||
| Strike et al[98] 2004 | Acute stress in male CAD patients, stable disease and PCTA or coronary intervention | Aspirin | Stroop Colour Word interference task | Baseline | % of PLA | ↑PLA (P < 0.05) in CAD at 75 min post stress vs healthy controls, group by trial interaction on PLA (P < 0.01) | |
| No statins 72 h | Stress | FACS | |||||
| No β-blockers 72 h | Mirror tracing task | 30 min post-stress | |||||
| Cross-sectional design | HADS | 75 min post-stress | |||||
| 17 patients vs 22 healthy | Sleep quality assessed by Scale of Jenkins et al | ||||||
| Wallén et al[100] 1997 | Acute mental and acute physical stress in patients with stable angina pectoris vs healthy controls | Aspirin, ACE inhibitors, digoxin, diuretics, β-blockers, calcium–channel blockers switched to study medication metoprolol and verapamil | Stroop Colour Word Conflict Test | Baseline | PF-4 | Physical exercise: patients ↑PF-4 (P < 0.05) and ↑β-TG (P < 0.01) vs baseline, healthy controls ↑β-TG (P < 0.01) and ↑PF-4 (P < 0.01) vs baseline; mental stress: ↑PF-4 (P = 0.06)NS and ↑β-TG (P < 0.05) in patients vs healthy controls | |
| Cross sectional design | Ergometer examination | Stress-task | β-TG | ||||
| 113 patients (21 on aspirin) vs 50 matched controls | ELISA | ||||||
| Tomoda et al[103] 1999 | Acute mental stress in patients with essential hypertension | WHO stage II patients with proteinuria, elevated serum creatinin, left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertensive retinopathy | Not specified | 10 min arithmetic test | Baseline | β-TG | Stress induced increase β-TG (P < 0.05) in WHO stage I and II patients vs rest, baseline β-TG levels (P < 0.05) in WHO stage II vs WHO stage I vs controls |
| Immediately post stress task | RIA | ||||||
| Cross-sectional design | |||||||
| 24 hypertensive (11 WHO stage I, 13 WHO stage II) patients vs 14 normotensive controls |
- Citation: Koudouovoh-Tripp P, Sperner-Unterweger B. Influence of mental stress on platelet bioactivity. World J Psychiatr 2012; 2(6): 134-147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v2/i6/134.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v2.i6.134
