Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2026; 16(9): 118536
Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118536
Published online Sep 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118536
Table 3 Comparison of two groups of lung function indicators (mean ± SD)
| Pulmonary function indicators | Phase | Control group (n = 77) | Observation group (n = 77) | t value | P value |
| FEV1 (L) | Before intervention | 1.24 ± 0.19 | 1.21 ± 0.22 | 0.906 | 0.367 |
| Postintervention | 1.62 ± 0.27a | 1.98 ± 0.39a | 6.660 | < 0.001 | |
| FVC (L) | Before intervention | 1.93 ± 0.31 | 1.91 ± 0.34 | 0.381 | 0.703 |
| Postintervention | 2.41 ± 0.39a | 2.86 ± 0.45a | 6.631 | < 0.001 | |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | Before intervention | 64.52 ± 4.56 | 63.35 ± 5.32 | 1.460 | 0.146 |
| Postintervention | 67.22 ± 4.26a | 69.23 ± 6.05a | 2.384 | 0.018 |
- Citation: Qiu YH, Yao JJ, Wu JY, Yang Q, Shen Y, Feng Q, Jin L. Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on lung function and psychological state of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(9): 118536
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i9/118536.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.118536