Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2026; 16(6): 118944
Published online Jun 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.118944
Published online Jun 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.118944
Table 3 Comparison of interpersonal attraction status, mean ± SD (points)
| Group | Task attraction | Social attraction | Physical attraction | Total score | ||||
| Pre-guidance | Post-guidance | Pre-guidance | Post-guidance | Pre-guidance | Post-guidance | Pre-guidance | Post-guidance | |
| Intervention group (n = 50) | 17.42 ± 4.58 | 24.14 ± 4.91a | 14.52 ± 3.95 | 21.06 ± 3.99a | 15.36 ± 3.91 | 22.32 ± 3.80a | 47.94 ± 12.34 | 67.74 ± 12.70a |
| Control group (n = 50) | 17.80 ± 4.14 | 21.46 ± 4.98a | 14.88 ± 3.47 | 18.00 ± 4.24a | 15.74 ± 3.56 | 18.80 ± 4.19a | 48.62 ± 11.08 | 58.80 ± 11.23a |
| t | 0.435 | 2.711 | 0.484 | 3.714 | 0.508 | 4.396 | 0.290 | 3.729 |
| P value | 0.664 | 0.008 | 0.629 | 0.000 | 0.612 | 0.000 | 0.773 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Ji W, Wang YQ, Zhao YY, Zhang WC, Jiang W. Alleviating social anxiety in college students: A comprehensive positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment model-based group counseling approach. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(6): 118944
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i6/118944.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.118944