BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2026; 16(6): 117084
Published online Jun 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.117084
Table 3 Comparison of psychosocial factors of study subjects (n = 284), n (%)/mean ± SD
Characteristic
Total (n = 284)
ASD group (n = 67)
Non-ASD group (n = 217)
Statistic
P value
Previous trauma historyχ2 = 8.1290.004
    None201 (70.8)38 (56.7)163 (75.1)
    Present83 (29.2)29 (43.3)54 (24.9)
Family support (FACES-IV)68.5 ± 12.361.2 ± 14.670.8 ± 10.4t = -5.823< 0.001
    Good (≥ 70 points)156 (54.9)22 (32.8)134 (61.8)
    Moderate (50-69 points)102 (35.9)32 (47.8)70 (32.3)
    Poor (< 50 points)26 (9.2)13 (19.4)13 (6.0)
Coping strategy efficacy total score (Kidcope)6.2 ± 2.15.1 ± 2.36.5 ± 1.9t = -4.968< 0.001
    High efficacy (≥ 7 points)118 (41.5)18 (26.9)100 (46.1)
    Moderate efficacy (4-6 points)124 (43.7)32 (47.8)92 (42.4)
    Low efficacy (< 4 points)42 (14.8)17 (25.4)25 (11.5)
Coping strategy effectiveness total score (Kidcope)18.4 ± 6.714.6 ± 7.219.6 ± 6.1t = -5.674< 0.001
    High effectiveness (≥ 22 points)89 (31.3)12 (17.9)77 (35.5)
    Moderate effectiveness (15-21 points)127 (44.7)28 (41.8)99 (45.6)
    Low effectiveness (< 15 points)68 (23.9)27 (40.3)41 (18.9)


Write to the Help Desk