Application of quantitative rehabilitation training and the teach-back health education model in fracture patients with anxiety and depression

Table 1 Comparison of general data between the 2 groups

Class	Conventional group (n = 60)	Combined group (n = 60)	Test statistics	P value
Age (year)	47.15 ± 7.37	46.80 ± 8.38	0.243	0.808
BMI (kg/m2)	21.84 ± 2.47	21.88 ± 2.47	-0.104	0.918
Gender			0.304	0.581
Male	32 (53.3)	35 (58.3)
Female	28 (46.7)	25 (41.7)
Education level			0.496	0.780
Lower secondary and below	21 (35.0)	18 (30.0)
Upper secondary	32 (53.3)	33 (55.0)
Tertiary education	7 (11.7)	9 (15.0)
Etiology			1.516	0.469
Traumatic injury	44 (73.3)	38 (63.3)
Osteoporosis	10 (16.7)	15 (25.0)
Other causes	6 (10.0)	7 (11.7)
Fracture classification			3.556	0.169
Type A	39 (65.0)	37 (61.7)
Type B	12 (20.0)	19 (31.7)
Type C	9 (15.0)	4 (6.6)
Surgical modality			2.466	0.291
Open reduction and internal fixation	13 (21.7)	11 (18.3)
Minimally invasive approach	16 (26.7)	10 (16.7)
Non-operative modality	31 (51.7)	39 (65.0)
Complications			-	1.000
No	56 (93.3)	57 (95.0)
Yes	4 (6.7)	3 (5.0)

Data were presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.