Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115520
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115520
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115520
Table 4 Comparison of family function status between two groups (points), mean ± SD
| FACES-II dimension | Poisoning group (n = 28) | Normal group (n = 222) | 95%CI | t value | P value |
| Cohesion | |||||
| Actual feelings | 36.7 ± 10.2 | 49.2 ± 8.6 | -16.4 to -8.6 | -6.784 | < 0.001 |
| Ideal condition | 58.7 ± 8.2 | 62.4 ± 7.8 | -7.3 to -0.1 | -2.359 | 0.019 |
| Ideal-actual difference | 22.0 ± 8.1 | 13.2 ± 5.4 | 4.9-12.7 | 6.195 | < 0.001 |
| Adaptability | |||||
| Actual feelings | 39.4 ± 9.1 | 46.7 ± 7.9 | -10.8 to -3.8 | -4.462 | < 0.001 |
| Ideal condition | 56.2 ± 7.9 | 58.9 ± 8.1 | -5.8 to 0.4 | -1.735 | 0.084 |
| Ideal-actual difference | 16.8 ± 7.2 | 12.2 ± 4.7 | 2.4-6.8 | 3.742 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Yu W, Wang F. Analysis of emergency adolescent antidepressant poisoning incidence and family psychological environment influencing factors. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 115520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/115520.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115520