Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115400
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115400
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115400
Table 9 Summary of statistically significant outcomes
| Outcome measure | Measurement | Gender | Key finding (intervention vs control) | Statistical significance (interaction) | Clinical/practical implication |
| Marital relationship | Communication | Male | Significant improvement in communication scores over time relative to control | β = 1.85, P = 0.014 | Improved verbal/non-verbal exchange |
| Communication | Female | Significant improvement in communication scores | β= 2.11, P = 0.022 | Enhanced emotional expression | |
| Affection | Female | Significant increase in affection scores | β = 2.20, P = 0.011 | Stronger emotional bonding | |
| Total score | Both | Significant improvement in overall relationship quality | Male: P = 0.003; female: P = 0.012 | Better dyadic adjustment during IVF | |
| Mental health | Anxiety | Male | Significant reduction in anxiety symptoms | β = -1.73, P = 0.030 | Reduced treatment-related arousal |
| Stress | Both | Significant reduction in stress levels | Male: P = 0.025; female: P = 0.029 | Effective stress buffering | |
| Reproductive | Sperm progressive motility | Male | Significant increase in progressive motility at week 3 and week 4 | Week 3: P < 0.001; week 4: P = 0.042 | Improved functional semen quality |
- Citation: Zeng WF, Zhang Q, Wang XR, Xu ZY, Huang CW, Zhang QQ, Yan HL, Wang YX. Efficacy evaluation of an affectionate touch-based psychological intervention program for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients: A controlled trial. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 115400
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/115400.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115400