Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115233
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115233
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115233
Table 6 Comparison of anxiety and depression scores between the two groups of patients, mean ± SD
| Project | Phase | Control group (n = 30) | Observation group (n = 30) | t value | P value |
| SAS (divide) | On admission | 59.91 ± 5.34 | 59.46 ± 5.29 | 0.328 | 0.744 |
| On the day of discharge | 48.83 ± 3.12 | 46.34 ± 2.87 | 3.217 | 0.002 | |
| Three months after discharge | 48.65 ± 5.09 | 43.97 ± 3.86 | 4.013 | < 0.001 | |
| SDS (divide) | On admission | 57.21 ± 5.13 | 58.18 ± 5.05 | 0.738 | 0.463 |
| On the day of discharge | 47.64 ± 3.25 | 45.25 ± 2.59 | 3.150 | 0.003 | |
| Three months after discharge | 46.48 ± 4.27 | 42.85 ± 3.24 | 3.709 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Cai SY, Gu HL, Zhao LH, Chen H. Health ecology-based nursing impact on stigma, anxiety, and depression in young and middle-aged type 2 diabetes patients. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 115233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/115233.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115233