BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2026; 16(3): 112649
Published online Mar 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i3.112649
Table 2 Comparative analysis of demographics, etiology, surgical parameters, and anesthesia type between depressed and non-depressed patients with asherman’s syndrome
Feature
Depressed group (n = 112)
Non-depressed group (n = 288)
P value
Patient demographics
Average age (years, mean ± SD)36.7 ± 4.832.4 ± 5.3< 0.001
Marital status (%)75.072.90.673
Pregnancy history (%)54.565.30.044
Etiology of asherman’s syndrome (%)P = 0.863
Post-abortion curettage50.947.6
Postpartum curettage23.221.9
Hysteroscopic surgery14.316.3
Other causes11.614.2
Classification of asherman’s syndrome (%)
Grade I (mild)17.931.90.005
Grade III (severe)53.632.6< 0.001
Surgical parameters
Average operating time (minutes, mean ± SD)63.2 ± 18.752.4 ± 15.1< 0.001
Surgical instruments (%)P = 0.791
Cold scissors51.855.6
Electrosurgical instruments38.435.8
Balloon technique9.88.7
Anti-adhesion barrier use (%)78.669.10.043
Anesthesia type (%)P = 0.327
General anesthesia66.163.2


Write to the Help Desk