©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Feb 19, 2026; 16(2): 113242
Published online Feb 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.113242
Published online Feb 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.113242
Table 2 Comparison of mental states between the groups, mean ± SD
| Group | Case | HAMA | GSES | SDS | |||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Experimental | 35 | 26.57 ± 3.21 | 10.74 ± 1.42a | 28.23 ± 3.49 | 36.54 ± 4.12a | 54.71 ± 3.30 | 32.74 ± 2.68a |
| Control | 35 | 26.86 ± 3.82 | 11.77 ± 2.16a | 28.20 ± 4.80 | 33.91 ± 4.18a | 55.29 ± 7.12 | 40.83 ± 4.27a |
| t | -0.339 | -2.356 | 0.028 | 2.649 | -0.431 | -9.491 | |
| P value | 0.736 | 0.021 | 0.977 | 0.010 | 0.668 | < 0.001 | |
- Citation: Hu Y, Tong TS, Zhang J, Zhu YN, Xia L, Yu JJ. Effect of a combined of positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment-based mental health intervention and role model incentives. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(2): 113242
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i2/113242.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.113242