©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Feb 19, 2026; 16(2): 110880
Published online Feb 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.110880
Published online Feb 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.110880
Table 2 Comparison of general data between the observation group and the control group, n (%)
| Groups | Gender | Age, mean ± SD | Disease duration, mean ± SD | Education level | |||
| Male | Female | Primary school | Junior/senior high | College | |||
| Control group (n = 53) | 31 (58.49) | 22 (41.51) | 46.21 ± 2.96 | 4.33 ± 0.89 | 11 (20.75) | 27 (50.94) | 15 (28.31) |
| Observation group (n = 53) | 30 (56.60) | 23 (53.40) | 46.30 ± 2.94 | 4.51 ± 0.86 | 12 (22.64) | 26 (49.06) | 15 (28.30) |
| χ2/t | 0.039 | 0.157 | 1.059 | 0.062 | |||
| P value | 0.844 | 0.875 | 0.292 | 0.969 | |||
- Citation: Li SY, Rao P. Cognitive intervention based on Positive Emotion-Engagement Relationship-Meaning-Achievement theory in patients with depression and insomnia: Application value. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(2): 110880
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i2/110880.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i2.110880