BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 124324
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124324
Table 1 Comparison of major interoceptive dimensions and commonly used assessment tools
Dimension (definition)
Tool/method
Measurement
Key advantages/limitations
Target populations
Ref.
IAc: Performance in detecting or discriminating bodily signalsHCTAgreement between reported and recorded heartbeatsSimple and widely used; influenced by time estimation, heart-rate knowledge, physiology, instructions, and scoringClinical and nonclinical adults[6,26,29-31]
IAc: Performance in detecting or discriminating bodily signalsHeartbeat discrimination tasksTrial-based discrimination of cardiac signalsLess reliant on explicit counting; sensitive to attention, cardiac signal strength, and task design; limited standardizationExperimental and clinical samples[5,28,33]
ISe: Self-reported attention to and appraisal of bodily sensationsMAIA/MAIA-2Multidimensional bodily attention, appraisal, and regulationBroad multidimensional assessment; reliability and factor structure vary; interpretation may be influenced by alexithymia and cultural contextGeneral and clinical adults, including MDD[24,25,34,40,68]
ISe: Self-reported attention to and appraisal of bodily sensationsBPQ-SFBody awareness and perceived autonomic reactivityBrief and easy to administer; may overlap with somatic or anxiety-related symptoms; does not assess objective accuracyGeneral, clinical, and cardiovascular samples[35-37]
IAw: Correspondence between task performance and confidencePerformance-confidence correspondenceCalibration of performance and confidenceAssesses metacognitive insight; depends on task validity and confidence metricsStudies combining interoceptive tasks with confidence ratings[4,5,69]


Write to the Help Desk