Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 124191
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124191
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124191
Table 2 Comparison of Distress Thermometer and Nurses’ Global Assessment of Suicide Risk scores before and after intervention between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | Case | DT | NGASR | ||
| Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Control | 49 | 6.82 ± 1.35 | 4.91 ± 1.18 | 5.76 ± 1.42 | 4.23 ± 1.09 |
| Observation | 49 | 6.79 ± 1.31 | 3.25 ± 0.92 | 5.71 ± 1.38 | 2.16 ± 0.81 |
| t value | 0.112 | 7.766 | 0.177 | 10.670 | |
| P value | 0.911 | < 0.001 | 0.860 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Yu HX, Huang CL, Zhu CJ, Zhao WW, Wang YY, Jin YM. Stepwise psychological intervention: Mitigated psychological distress and suicide risk in patients with liver cancer chemoembolization. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124191
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/124191.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.124191