Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 122781
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.122781
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.122781
Table 5 Comparison of negative emotion recognition and nursing response efficiency between the two groups, n (%)
| Indicator | Conventional care group | Artificial intelligence personalized care group | t/χ2 value | P value |
| Negative emotion recognition rate | 18 (66.67) | 31 (93.94) | 7.377 | 0.007 |
| First identification time (hours) | 18.70 ± 6.32 | 6.82 ± 2.95 | 9.607 | < 0.001 |
| Nursing response time (minutes) | 42.19 ± 11.73 | 17.67 ± 5.42 | 10.707 | < 0.001 |
| Intervention matching rate | 16 (59.26) | 30 (90.91) | 8.315 | 0.004 |
| Emotional improvement rate within 24 hours | 14 (51.85) | 27 (81.82) | 6.163 | 0.013 |
- Citation: Zhu YF, Xuan XL, Li YQ. Retrospective analysis of nursing interventions using artificial intelligence multimodal emotion recognition for perioperative depression in head and neck tumors. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 122781
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/122781.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.122781