Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 122781
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.122781
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.122781
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative clinical outcomes between the two groups of patients, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Indicator | Conventional care group | Artificial intelligence personalized care group | t/χ2 value | P value |
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 14.48 ± 4.13 | 11.76 ± 3.36 | 2.814 | 0.007 |
| Incidence of complications | 11 (40.74) | 5 (15.15) | 4.972 | 0.026 |
| SF-36 PCS score | 56.41 ± 8.26 | 63.52 ± 7.84 | -3.412 | 0.001 |
| SF-36 MCS score | 57.70 ± 7.92 | 66.27 ± 7.20 | -4.385 | < 0.001 |
| ERS (minutes/day) | 1.51 ± 0.44 | 2.39 ± 0.52 | -6.981 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhu YF, Xuan XL, Li YQ. Retrospective analysis of nursing interventions using artificial intelligence multimodal emotion recognition for perioperative depression in head and neck tumors. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 122781
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/122781.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.122781