Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2026; 16(11): 116382
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.116382
Published online Nov 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.116382
Table 2 Implementation barriers and evidence-based solutions for emergency department suicide prevention programs
| Barrier category | Specific barriers | Evidence-based solutions | Supporting evidence |
| Workforce and training | Limited mental health specialists in ED; inadequate suicide risk assessment training; high staff turnover | Task-shifting with protocolized interventions; standardized training programs; telehealth consultation models | Nurse-led SPI implementation[20]; ED-SAFE training protocols[11]; SPCC telehealth model[40] |
| Workflow and resources | Time constraints; competing clinical priorities; lack of dedicated space for interventions | Integration into nursing discharge process; electronic health record prompts; dedicated “suicide prevention coordinator” role | SPI embedded in discharge workflow[29]; EHR clinical decision support[36]; follow-up coordinator models[45] |
| Assessment and documentation | Inconsistent risk assessment; lack of standardized tools; poor documentation | Mandatory use of validated tools (Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale); structured documentation templates; automated risk scoring | Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale validation in ED settings[44]; standardized assessment protocols[11] |
| Care coordination | Fragmented post-ED care; poor communication with outpatient providers; lost to follow-up | Warm hand-offs; shared EHR alerts; fixed appointment timelines (≤ 7 days); centralized follow-up systems | Integrated care pathways[49]; formal community partnerships[12]; systematic contact protocols[31] |
| Cultural and systemic | Stigma; organizational resistance; lack of leadership support; funding constraints | Implementation science frameworks (RE-AIM, CFIR); leadership engagement; quality improvement initiatives | Zero suicide framework implementation[36]; organizational readiness assessment[13] |
| Technology and access | Digital divide; privacy concerns; interoperability issues | Hybrid models (in-person + digital); app-based safety planning; telehealth follow-up | Digital DBT interventions[15]; SPI apps[23]; telehealth service models[40] |
- Citation: Luo FG, Wu WY, Wang JJ, Fang KJ, Xing HY, Yan J. Implementing psychological care in emergency departments for suicide prevention. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 116382
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i11/116382.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.116382