BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 124176
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.124176
Table 2 Summary of major event-related potentials components in delay discounting tasks
ERP
Time window
Typical electrode sites
Functional significance
Typical findings in delay discounting tasks
CNVCue-to-response (sustained slow potential)Frontocentral (Fz, Cz)Anticipatory preparation, motivational engagementLarger CNV for delay-escape vs delay-inescapable conditions
P200150-250 millisecondFrontocentral (Fz, FCz)Early attentional allocationGreater amplitude in loss vs gain context; larger for delayed vs immediate options
N2200-350 millisecondFrontocentral (Fz, FCz)Conflict monitoring, cognitive controlIncreased amplitude under high conflict; negatively correlated with immediate choice rate
RewP/FRN250-350 millisecondFrontocentral (FCz)Reward value encoding, outcome evaluationLarger for immediate than delayed rewards; high discounters show larger RewP for immediate rewards
P300300-500 millisecondParietal (Pz, P3, P4)Attentional resource allocation, motivational salience, subjective value representationAmplitude decreases with longer delays; larger for delayed than immediate choices
LPP400-900 millisecondParietal (Pz, CPz)Sustained emotional and motivational processingSensitive to probability; larger in loss context; larger for immediate vs delayed rewards
Theta4-8 Hz (time-frequency)FrontocentralDecision conflict, cognitive controlIncreased theta power after immediate choices in low discounters; higher theta during impulsive choices
Beta13-30 Hz (time-frequency)FrontalCognitive resource allocation, “cool” system processingLower beta power in the time-overestimation group; increased beta during non-impulsive choices


Write to the Help Desk