BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 121996
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.121996
Table 6 Subgroup analysis: Psychological scores and assisted reproductive technology outcomes stratified by cesarean scar defect severity and pregnancy outcome, mean ± SD
Subgroup
SAS
SDS
FertiQoL
Pregnancy rate (%)
P (SAS/SDS)
Mild CSD (RMT ≥ 3.5 mm, n = 35)
Pregnant (n = 26)52.8 ± 9.050.4 ± 8.658.9 ± 7.974.3-
Non-pregnant (n = 9)61.2 ± 9.859.1 ± 9.249.6 ± 8.425.70.028
Moderate CSD (RMT 2.5-3.4 mm, n = 37)
Pregnant (n = 20)55.3 ± 9.852.8 ± 9.356.4 ± 8.854.1-
Non-pregnant (n = 17)64.1 ± 10.462.3 ± 10.146.8 ± 9.145.90.009
Severe CSD (RMT < 2.5 mm, n = 28)
Pregnant (n = 5)58.0 ± 11.255.6 ± 10.453.2 ± 9.017.9-
Non-pregnant (n = 23)65.4 ± 10.865.0 ± 9.844.2 ± 9.682.10.018
P value (across CSD severity groups, non-pregnant only)
Between-group (non-pregnant)0.0480.0390.044-One-way ANOVA


Write to the Help Desk