BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Basic Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jan 19, 2026; 16(1): 112432
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.112432
Figure 2
Figure 2 General condition comparisons of the animals. A: Comparison of body weight gain rate in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats before and after tail clamping; B: Comparison of body weight gain rate in Wistar rats before and after tail clamping; C: Blood glucose levels in Wistar rats at the end of modeling; D: Esophageal pH values in Wistar rats at the end of modeling. aP < 0.01 vs post-SD-modified; bP < 0.05 vs pre-Wistar-model; cP < 0.01 vs pre-Wistar-modified; dP < 0.01 vs post-Wistar-sham; eP < 0.01 vs Wistar-sham. SD: Sprague-Dawley.


Write to the Help Desk