BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 1
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Psychiatry
ISSN
2220-3206
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jan 19, 2026; 16(1): 110298
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110298
Table 2 Functional score comparisons
Group
VAS
WOMAC
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
Control group (n = 57)6.00 (5.00, 7.00)2.50 (2.00, 3.00)a49.17 ± 6.4531.03 ± 4.60a
Study group (n = 66)7.00 (5.00, 8.00)3.00 (3.00, 4.00)a47.30 ± 5.0537.86 ± 3.92a
t value-1.719-5.1451.799-8.884
P value0.081< 0.0010.075< 0.001
aP < 0.05 vs pre-treatment score.
VAS: Visual Analog Scale; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.