©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jan 19, 2026; 16(1): 110146
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110146
Published online Jan 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110146
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with low anterior resection syndrome undergoing electroacupuncture or standard postoperative care (n = 100), mean ± SD/n (%)
| Characteristics | Electroacupuncture group (n = 50) | Control group (n = 50) | Test statistic1 | P value2 |
| Demographic variables | ||||
| Age, years | 61.2 ± 8.5 | 62.1 ± 7.9 | t = 0.641 | 0.523 |
| Sex | χ2 = 0.168 | 0.682 | ||
| Male | 30 (60) | 28 (56) | ||
| Female | 20 (40) | 22 (44) | ||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.7 ± 3.2 | 24.1 ± 3.5 | t = 0.685 | 0.497 |
| Education level ≥ high school | 38 (76) | 36 (72) | χ2 = 0.202 | 0.653 |
| Employment status | χ2 = 0.158 | 0.691 | ||
| Employed | 29 (58) | 27 (54) | ||
| Unemployed | 21 (42) | 23 (46) | ||
| Comorbidities | ||||
| Hypertension | 17 (34) | 19 (38) | χ2 = 0.164 | 0.685 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 10 (20) | 9 (18) | χ2 = 0.072 | 0.791 |
| Smoking history | 12 (24) | 14 (28) | χ2 = 0.214 | 0.644 |
| Surgical and oncological characteristics | ||||
| TNM stage | χ2 = 0.410 | 0.815 | ||
| Stage I | 8 (16) | 7 (14) | ||
| Stage II | 26 (52) | 24 (48) | ||
| Stage III | 16 (32) | 19 (38) | ||
| Time since surgery, months | 10.3 ± 4.1 | 10.8 ± 4.4 | t = 0.567 | 0.571 |
| Anastomosis level from anal verge, cm | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 5.2 ± 0.9 | t = 0.779 | 0.438 |
| Type of surgery | χ2 = 0.319 | 0.573 | ||
| Laparoscopic | 43 (86) | 41 (82) | ||
| Open | 7 (14) | 9 (18) | ||
| Neoadjuvant radiotherapy | 18 (36) | 20 (40) | χ2 = 0.170 | 0.684 |
| Functional status | ||||
| LARS score (0-42) | 32.4 ± 5.6 | 31.9 ± 5.9 | t = 0.426 | 0.672 |
| LARS severity category | χ2 = 0.040 | 0.842 | ||
| Moderate (21-29) | 22 (44) | 21 (42) | ||
| Severe (≥ 30) | 28 (56) | 29 (58) | ||
| Baseline quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 total) | 56.3 ± 8.9 | 57.0 ± 9.1 | t = 0.437 | 0.664 |
| Psychological characteristics | ||||
| Anxiety score (HADS-A, 0-21) | 8.1 ± 3.2 | 8.5 ± 3.5 | t = 0.610 | 0.544 |
| Depression score (HADS-D, 0-21) | 7.6 ± 3.4 | 7.9 ± 3.7 | t = 0.427 | 0.671 |
| General self-efficacy (GSES, 10-40) | 28.2 ± 4.5 | 27.6 ± 5.1 | t = 0.692 | 0.493 |
| Perceived social support (PSSS, 12-84) | 59.4 ± 8.9 | 58.1 ± 9.5 | t = 0.796 | 0.428 |
| Coping strategy score (Brief COPE, 14-56) | 38.5 ± 6.1 | 37.9 ± 6.4 | t = 0.561 | 0.577 |
| Body image disturbance (BIS, 0-30) | 12.7 ± 4.3 | 13.1 ± 4.7 | t = 0.460 | 0.649 |
- Citation: Wang N, Yang Y, Li SS, Wang XF. Electroacupuncture improves psychosocial outcomes in rectal cancer patients with bowel dysfunction. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(1): 110146
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i1/110146.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i1.110146