©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Figure 3 Dynamic comparison of Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status score, Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery and Hamilton Depression Scale-24 scores between the combined group and the control group during the treatment process.
A: Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status score comparison; B: Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery comparison; C: Hamilton Depression Scale-24 comparison. BRANS: Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status score; MCCB: Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery; HAMD-24: Hamilton Depression Scale-24; ECT: Electroconvulsive therapy.
- Citation: Zhao GG, Zhao J, Kong Y, Pang YP, Zheng XN, Zhang YW. Effect of esketamine and etomidate anesthesia on neuroplasticity in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(9): 109458
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i9/109458.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458