©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Table 6 Comparison of long-term efficacy statistics between two groups of patients
| n | BRANS | MCCB | HAMD-24 | WCST | TOH | |
| Combined group | 55 | 1.49 ± 0.49 | 1.16 ± 0.44 | -0.54 ± 0.37 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 1.28 ± 0.65 |
| Control group | 54 | 1.44 ± 0.52 | 1.12 ± 0.47 | -0.52 ± 0.41 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 1.25 ± 0.59 |
| t value | 0.182 | 0.106 | 0.124 | 0.085 | 0.127 | |
| P value | 0.874 | 0.926 | 0.908 | 0.956 | 0.905 |
- Citation: Zhao GG, Zhao J, Kong Y, Pang YP, Zheng XN, Zhang YW. Effect of esketamine and etomidate anesthesia on neuroplasticity in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(9): 109458
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i9/109458.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458