Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2025; 15(9): 109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Published online Sep 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458
Table 2 Comparison of electroconvulsive therapy monitoring indicators between combination group and control group
n | Initial threshold charge (mc) | Final threshold charge (mc) | Total treatment electricity (mc) | Mean seizure duration (mc) | |
Combined group | 56 | 116.02 ± 13.76 | 144.01 ± 13.73 | 1266.07 ± 212.01 | 50.06 ± 8.08 |
Control group | 54 | 114.18 ± 14.56 | 170.23 ± 24.76 | 1866.02 ± 260.82 | 48.77 ± 8.82 |
t value | 2.007 | -52.149 | -99.285 | 2.016 | |
P value | 0.475 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.478 |
- Citation: Zhao GG, Zhao J, Kong Y, Pang YP, Zheng XN, Zhang YW. Effect of esketamine and etomidate anesthesia on neuroplasticity in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(9): 109458
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i9/109458.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.109458