BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2025; 15(12): 111721
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.111721
Table 2 Changes in psychological status of ovarian cancer patients at different treatment time points, mean ± SD
Treatment group
Assessment scale
Baseline
Month 3
t value (vs baseline)
P value (vs baseline)
Month 6
t value (vs month 3)
P value (vs month 3)
Surgery group (n = 78)SAS score46.3 ± 6.252.1 ± 7.0bt = 5.24< 0.0147.9 ± 6.5at = 3.420.02
SDS score47.6 ± 6.353.4 ± 6.8bt = 5.36< 0.0148.8 ± 6.6at = 3.810.03
Chemotherapy group (n = 65)SAS score45.8 ± 6.555.7 ± 7.3ct = 8.52< 0.00153.4 ± 7.1t = 1.860.07
SDS score46.9 ± 6.156.9 ± 7.4ct = 8.94< 0.00155.2 ± 7.3t = 1.430.16
Targeted therapy group (n = 61)SAS score45.5 ± 6.149.8 ± 6.8bt = 4.16< 0.0145.7 ± 6.3at = 3.680.02
SDS score47.2 ± 6.251.2 ± 6.5bt = 3.85< 0.0146.9 ± 6.4at = 3.960.01
Combined therapy group (n = 82)SAS score47.2 ± 6.658.9 ± 7.5ct = 9.35< 0.00156.8 ± 7.4t = 1.560.12
SDS score48.4 ± 6.760.5 ± 7.6ct = 9.86< 0.00159.3 ± 7.5t = 0.870.39
Between-group comparisonSAS scoreF = 0.86; P = 0.463F = 18.43; P < 0.001F = 24.67; P < 0.001
SDS scoreF = 0.92; P = 0.432F = 20.35; P < 0.001F = 25.82; P < 0.001


Write to the Help Desk