©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2025; 15(12): 109546
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.109546
Published online Dec 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.109546
Table 3 Comparison of prolapse distance between two group (cm), mean ± SD
| Group | n | Anterior vaginal | Posterior vaginal | Top of vagina | |||
| Preoperative | 3 months after surgery | Preoperative | 3 months after surgery | Preoperative | 3 months after surgery | ||
| Control group | 30 | 1.53 ± 0.36 | -1.86 ± 0.43a | -1.28 ± 0.78 | -2.17 ± 0.38a | 1.52 ± 0.38 | -2.94 ± 0.26a |
| Observer group | 30 | 1.60 ± 0.38 | -2.23 ± 0.37a | -1.33 ± 0.72 | -2.46 ± 0.49a | 1.63 ± 0.32 | -3.11 ± 0.17a |
| t value | 0.733 | 3.572 | 0.258 | 2.562 | 1.213 | 2.997 | |
| P value | 0.467 | 0.001 | 0.797 | 0.013 | 0.230 | 0.004 | |
- Citation: Zhang RR, Zhao RH, Zhang L, Ma RY, Chen MZ. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation: Efficacy in treating pelvic prolapse and influence on patients’ anxiety and depression. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(12): 109546
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i12/109546.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i12.109546