©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2025; 15(11): 109332
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332
Table 2 Comparison of pre-treatment scores for movement, balance, activities of daily living, and joint range of motion between the two groups
| Control (n = 30) | Electromyographic biofeedback (n = 30) | P value | |
| FMA (upper limb) score | 15.5 (15,16) | 15 (14,16) | 0.237 |
| FMA (lower limb) score | 10 (9,11) | 10 (9,11) | 0.717 |
| Berg score | 11.23 ± 3.68 | 11.27 ± 3.54 | 0.972 |
| ADL score | 41.77 ± 11.17 | 40.67 ± 10.14 | 0.691 |
| Wrist joint AROM (°) | 22.33 ± 5.52 | 21.20 ± 6.30 | 0.462 |
| Ankle joint AROM (°) | 21.33 ± 5.65 | 21.17 ± 5.58 | 0.909 |
- Citation: Yu L, Niu H, Ji WB, Liu ZG, Jiang B, Wang WY. Application of electromyographic biofeedback therapy in physical dysfunction rehabilitation and post-stroke anxiety reduction in stroke survivors. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 109332
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i11/109332.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332