©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2025; 15(11): 109332
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332
Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical data between the two groups
| Control (n = 30) | Electromyographic biofeedback (n = 30) | P value | |
| Gender | 0.795 | ||
| Male | 16 | 17 | |
| Female | 14 | 13 | |
| Age (years) | 60.07 ± 9.57 | 59.80 ± 10.05 | 0.917 |
| Weight (kg) | 73.27 ± 3.45 | 75.18 ± 4.06 | 0.054 |
| Height (cm) | 167.69 ± 8.94 | 168.75 ± 9.32 | 0.653 |
| Duration (days) | 17.33 ± 5.80 | 17.63 ± 6.22 | 0.847 |
| Disease | 0.795 | ||
| Hemorrhage | 13 | 14 | |
| Infarction | 17 | 16 | |
| Disease | 0.793 | ||
| Left | 18 | 17 | |
| Right | 12 | 13 |
- Citation: Yu L, Niu H, Ji WB, Liu ZG, Jiang B, Wang WY. Application of electromyographic biofeedback therapy in physical dysfunction rehabilitation and post-stroke anxiety reduction in stroke survivors. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 109332
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i11/109332.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109332