©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2025; 15(11): 106164
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106164
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106164
Figure 2 Results and evaluation table of literature quality assessment.
A: Situation of literature quality assessment; B: Literature quality evaluation table. Green indicates low risk, yellow indicates uncertainty, and orange indicates high risk. Green is marked as 1 point, indicating "yes"; orange is marked as 0 points, indicating "no"; yellow is marked as 0.5 points, indicating "not clear". This scale is highly flexible, and users can adjust it according to the actual research situation. The total score of this scale is 7.0 points. Literature with a quality score of 6.0-7.0 points is of grade A (high-quality literature), literature with a score of 4.0-5.5 points is of grade B (medium-quality literature), and literature with a score of less than 4.0 points is of grade C (low-quality literature).
- Citation: Guo L, He LX, Wan PQ, Zhen XM, Xiao F, Wu WB, Su MH, Gao BH, Liu ZH. Meta-analysis of factors associated with the incidence of comorbid depression and anxiety in patients with chronic hepatitis B. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 106164
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i11/106164.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106164