Threat-related attentional bias in subjects with different looming cognitive styles: Evidence based on eye-tracking study

Table 4 Four eye-tracking metrics among individuals with different looming cognitive styles

Variable		High LCS (n = 27)		Low LCS (n = 31)		F	P value
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD
First fixation latency (ms)	Threat	473.32	83.34	544.85	144.61	5.11	0.028
	Neutral	818.79	156.95	717.44	105.80	8.49	0.005
First fixation duration (ms)	Threat	244.17	57.73	298.45	173.46	2.41	0.126
	Neutral	279.68	86.40	302.93	142.95	0.54	0.465
Fixation duration (ms)	Threat	905.23	247.00	901.63	231.09	2.41	0.955
	Neutral	679.62	174.85	853.20	271.29	0.54	0.006
Fixation count (n)	Threat	292.41	91.00	253.32	101.46	2.36	0.130
	Neutral	195.41	66.65	234.97	79.04	4.18	0.046
First fixation latency bias (ms)	Bias scores	-345.46	142.97	-172.63	168.80	0.01	0.914
First fixation duration bias (ms)	Bias scores	-35.63	44.14	-4.52	43.19	0.22	0.643
Gaze duration bias (%)	Threat	56.71	0.05	51.46	0.07	4.07	0.048
Fixation orientation bias (%)	Threat	60.24	0.05	50.63	0.08	6.11	0.016

LCS: Looming cognitive styles.