Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological care for intensive care unit patients at nutritional risk: A comparative study

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 10

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Psychiatry

ISSN

2220-3206

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 108276
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276

Table 6 Comparison of physiological stress indicators between two groups of patients, mean ± SD

Physiological parameters	Study group (n = 50)	Control group (n = 50)	P value
Average heart rate (beats/minute)	84 ± 11	96 ± 14	0.021
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)	125 ± 15	138 ± 18	0.016

Citation: Wan X, Tan L, Deng F. Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological care for intensive care unit patients at nutritional risk: A comparative study. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(10): 108276
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i10/108276.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276

Wan X, Tan L, Deng F. Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological care for intensive care unit patients at nutritional risk: A comparative study. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(10): 108276 [PMID: 41112600 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.