©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 108276
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276
Table 2 Comparison of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores between the two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | Anxious SAS | Depressed SDS | ||
| Before the intervention | After the intervention | Before the intervention | After the intervention | |
| Study group, n = 50 | 53.11 ± 5.28 | 47.28 ± 5.04 | 58.28 ± 7.99 | 47.79 ± 73.4 |
| Control group, n = 50 | 53.12 ± 5.55 | 49.85 ± 5.37 | 57.63 ± 8.03 | 50.55 ± 7.23 |
| t | 0.000 | 7.306 | 0.198 | 4.471 |
| P value | 0.992 | 0.007 | 0.658 | 0.037 |
- Citation: Wan X, Tan L, Deng F. Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological care for intensive care unit patients at nutritional risk: A comparative study. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(10): 108276
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i10/108276.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276