©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2025; 15(10): 108276
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276
Published online Oct 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276
Table 1 Analysis and comparison of general data between two groups, mean ± SD
| Group | Number | Age (year) | Order of severity (n) | Body mass index (kg/m2) | Gender (male/female, n) | ||
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | |||||
| Control group | 50 | 30.1 ± 2.1 | 16 | 23 | 11 | 23.43 ± 1.98 | 29/21 |
| Study group | 50 | 29.9 ± 3.1 | 14 | 22 | 14 | 23.59 ± 1.24 | 30/20 |
| t/χ2 | 0.171 | 0.190 | 0.040 | 0.234 | 0.281 | 0.041 | |
| P value | 0.680 | 0.663 | 0.840 | 0.597 | 0.597 | 0.839 | |
- Citation: Wan X, Tan L, Deng F. Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological care for intensive care unit patients at nutritional risk: A comparative study. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(10): 108276
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i10/108276.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i10.108276