Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Infect Dis. Nov 25, 2016; 6(4): 67-72
Published online Nov 25, 2016. doi: 10.5495/wjcid.v6.i4.67
Table 3 Increase of diagnosis divided per age group adding search of IgA to IgM, compared to cases that can be diagnosed considering IgM alone
Age (yr)
Antibodies0-1011-2021-3031-4041-5051-6061-7071-80> 80
n913025485591155289283
IgM without IgA17 (18.7%)5 (16.7%)2 (8.0%)6 (12.5%)2 (3.6%)4 (4.4%)5 (3.2%)4 (1.4%)8 (2.8%)
95%CI10.69-26.713.35-30.050.00-18.633.14-21.860.00-8.520.19-8.610.43-5.970.05-2.750.88-4.72
IgA without IgM1 (1.1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2.1%)0 (0%)4 (4.4%)5 (3.2%)12 (4.1%)14 (4.9%)
95%CI0.00-3.240.00-0.000.00-0.000.00-6.160.00-0.000.19-8.610.43-5.971.81-6.392.38-7.41
IgM plus IgA5 (5.5%)3 (10.0%)1 (4.0%)1 (2.1%)0 (0%)1 (1.1%)0 (0%)2 (0.7%)0 (0%)
95%CI0.82-10.180.00-20.740.00-11.680.00-6.160.00-0.000.00-3.240.00-0.000.00-1.660.00-0.00
Increase of diagnosis1.1%0%0%2.1%0%4.4%3.2%4.1%4.9%
95%CI0.00-3.240.00-0.000.00-0.000.00-6.160.00-0.000.19-8.610.43-5.971.81-6.392.38-7.41