Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Exp Med. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 124656
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.124656
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.124656
Table 1 Subdermal temperature response at baseline and 20 minutes
| Condition | T0 [°C (°F)] | T20 [°C (°F)] | ΔT20 [°C (°F)] |
| SootheAway 1 | 42.5 (108.5 °F) | 38.6 (101.5 °F) | -3.9 (-7.0 °F) |
| SootheAway 2 | 35.6 (96.1 °F) | 27.2 (81.0 °F) | -8.4 (-15.1 °F) |
| ThermoCuff | 35.4 (95.7 °F) | 20.6 (69.1 °F) | -14.8 (-26.6 °F) |
| Ambient | 40.8 (105.4 °F) | 39.0 (102.2 °F) | -1.8 (-3.2 °F) |
- Citation: Ibrahim MA, Abdelhameed B, Beltagi A, Masoud M, Mohamed SAA, Khalifa AA. Convection-based vs conduction-based cooling in rehabilitation: A cadaveric porcine study of surface and intra-articular temperature reduction. World J Exp Med 2026; 16(3): 124656
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v16/i3/124656.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.124656