Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Exp Med. Jun 20, 2025; 15(2): 102345
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102345
Published online Jun 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102345
Table 1 Clinical Interpretation of widespread weak D in distinct groups
Number | Ethnic group | Weak D subtypes | Clinical interpretation | Ref. |
1 | Caucasian | Weak D types 1, 2, 3 | Can be treated as D-positive for RhIG administration and transfusion | [32,34] |
2 | Asian | Asia type DEL (RHD 1227 G > A) | Appears D-negative in conventional serology but can be treated as D-positive | [34] |
3 | Iranian | Weak D type 15 | Most prevalent; weak D types 1, 2, and 3 account for 15% of cases | [33] |
4 | Brazilian | Weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4 | Most frequent in descending order; presence of both caucasian and arican D variants | [35] |
5 | Australian | Weak D types 1, 2, 3 | Found in 75% of weak D samples; some other types (1.1, 5, 15, 17, 90) showed partial D-epitope profiles | [36] |
6 | Chinese | Various | 45 RHD alleles were identified, including 11 novel variants; 3.5% carried DEL alleles | [37] |
- Citation: Sainath PB, Ramaiyan V. Weak D phenotype in transfusion medicine and obstetrics: Challenges and opportunities. World J Exp Med 2025; 15(2): 102345
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v15/i2/102345.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v15.i2.102345