Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Jul 24, 2014; 3(2): 54-65
Published online Jul 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.54
Table 3 Summary of the most recent meta-analyses comparing laparoscopic techniques for adrenalectomy
Ref.RAL-A vs MI-A
TL-A vs RL-A
LESS-A vs MI-A
Brandao et al[30]Nigri et al[27]Wang et al[41]
n6001205443
Mean tumor size (cm)3.86, 3.784.0, 3.32.7, 3.43
(Odds ratio, CI)NA0.48 (-0.21-1.18)- 0.69 (-1.11--0.26)
P-valueNS0.170.002
Mean operating time (min)175, 148132, 136113.1, 92.7
(Estimate, CI)5.88 (-6.02-17.79)-11.07 (-41.38-19.24)14.97 (4.69-25.24)
P-value0.330.470.004
Mean EBL (mL)44, 69115, 8574.2, 79.7
(Estimate, CI)-18.21 (-29.11--7.32)29.7 (-10.32-69.72)-1.4 (-9.72-6.91)
P-value< 0.00010.150.74
Mean LOS3.78, 3.176.4, 5.53.82, 4.38
(Estimate, CI)-0.43 (-0.56--0.30)0.66 (-0.11-1.43)-0.5(-1.02-0.02)
P-value< 0.00010.090.06
Mean % conversion rate4.4, 7.17.23, 7.747.8, 1.2
(Odds ratio, CI)0.82 (0.39-1.75)NA4.66 (0.88-24.64)
P-value0.61NA0.07
Mean % complication rate3.6, 6.88, 614.2, 10.1
(Odds ratio, CI)-0.04 (-0.07--0.00)0.923 (0.58-1.46)1.83 (0.88-3.81)
P-value0.050.730.1