Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Jul 24, 2014; 3(2): 54-65
Published online Jul 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.54
Table 2 Outcomes from select studies comparing minimally-invasive adrenalectomy to open surgical adrenalectomy
Ref.NMean tumor size (cm)ACC or MET (%)1OT (min)EBL (mL)LOS (d)Conversion (%)Complications (%)
Assalia et al[116]581 MI-A2.80.91841542.9-10.9
753 OS-A4.15.81623097.2-35.8
Lee et al[59]358 MI-A-13.6174-4.1-3.6
311 OS-A-44.5234-9.4-17.4
Eichhorn-Wharry et al[119]1980 MI-A-4.1146-2.8-1.8
592 OS-A-18.4186-6.7-7.6
Lombardi et al[120]30 MI-A7.7100135-5.303.4
126 OS-A9100129-9.3-5.6
Mir et al[121]18 MI-A710029815004245.0
26 OS-A1310027311006-20.0
Donatini et al[79]13 MI-A5.5100--708.0
21 OS-A6.8100--9-14.0
Bittner et al[122]356 MI-A3.25.9159-2.56.211.0
46 OS-A8.528.2197-9.1-50.0