Penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction, use and preference for malleable vs inflatable

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 2

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Urology

ISSN

2219-2816

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Clin Urol. Jul 24, 2014; 3(2): 134-138
Published online Jul 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.134

Table 1 Etiology, infection rate and reoperation n (%)

MPP: Malleable penile prosthesis; IPP: Inflatable penile prosthesis.

Citation: Bertó RR, López-Acón JD, Marco SL, Jurado DGO, Oliva FD, Baenas MAC, Tormo FB. Penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction, use and preference for malleable vs inflatable. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(2): 134-138
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v3/i2/134.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.134

Bertó RR, López-Acón JD, Marco SL, Jurado DGO, Oliva FD, Baenas MAC, Tormo FB. Penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction, use and preference for malleable vs inflatable. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(2): 134-138 [DOI: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.134]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.