Double incontinence among women globally: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 9 Study quality assessment summary

Ref.	Sample size	Study design score	Definition clarity	Overall quality
Yuaso et al[7], 2018	865	High	Good	High
Ribeiro et al[5], 2019	227	Moderate	Good	Moderate
Gallas et al[1], 2018	402	Moderate	Good	Moderate
Güngör Uğurlucan et al[3], 2014	2518	High	Good	High
Wu et al[8], 2015	3497	High	Good	High
Matthews et al[12], 2013	64396	High	Good	High
Johannessen et al[2], 2018	976	High	Good	High
	1031	High	Good	High
Luo et al[4], 2020	700	Moderate	Good	Moderate
Slieker-ten Hove et al[13], 2010	1397	Moderate	Good	Moderate