Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng.
World J Stomatol. Feb 20, 2013; 2(1): 18-23
Published online Feb 20, 2013. doi: 10.5321/wjs.v2.i1.18
Table 2 Results of DIAGNOdent, expressed as mean ± SE, quartiles and range of variation
MaterialMednMeanStructural equation modelingMinMaxP25P50P75Med1 vs Med2
Artificial Saliva1106.100.7952114.756.007.500.759
2108.204.540450.001.0014.75
L. fermentum1105.400.7922103.005.507.250.011
21019.406.312637.009.5027.50
S. mutans1105.600.859292.006.508.000.011
21030.0010.330999.2515.5047.00
S. mutans + L. fermentum1106.000.9782124.505.008.500.005
21031.903.29164725.0029.5043.75
S. mutans + L. fermentum ozone + remin1205.150.7821122.254.008.75< 0.001
22045.955.90209924.5037.0068.50
Comparisons between 5 groups1P = 0.730
2P < 0.001