Therapeutics Advances
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Ophthalmol. Aug 12, 2013; 3(3): 20-31
Published online Aug 12, 2013. doi: 10.5318/wjo.v3.i3.20
Table 2 Paraclinic criteria for diagnosis of keratoconus[4]
CriteriaValues in keratoconus
Curvature> 46 to 47 D
Asymetry I-S> 1.4 D
Irregularity> 20 or 30 degrees with respect to the vertical meridian
Keratometric difference between the 2 eyes> 1 D
Anterior elevation< 15 m in Placido rings images and < 12 m in Scheimpflug images
Posterior elevation< 35 m in Placido rings images and < 18 m in Scheimpflug images
PachymetryThinnest, decentered point, difference of 100 m between center and periphery
Aphericity (Q)Between -0.5 and < -1
EccentricityApproaching 1
Form factorApproaching 0
Corneal irregularity> 1.1-5
Medium toric keratometry47.3-60 D
Surface irregularity index> 1.55
Predicted corneal acuity (Holladay Report)> 0
Keratoconus index (Maeda)> 0
Keratoconus % index> 100
Keratoconus prediction index> 0.38
Surface variation index> 41
Vertical asymmetry index0.32
Keratoconus index> 1.07
Central keratoconus index> 1.03
Smallest curvature radius> 6.71
Largest asymmetry index> 21
Height decentration index> 0.016
Aberration coefficient> 1
AberrationVertical Coma and Coma-like RMS (> 1.5 m)
Corneal volume analysis> 57.98 ± 2.65 mm3
Corneal hysterisis> 9.64 mmHg
Corneal resistance factor> 9.6 mmHg