©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Dermatol. Nov 2, 2016; 5(4): 129-135
Published online Nov 2, 2016. doi: 10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129
Published online Nov 2, 2016. doi: 10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129
Table 3 All measurement points of circumferential reduction per treatment area, number of treatments and body mass index (each line represents a separate measurement point)
| Area | Circumference measurement | Circumferential reduction (cm) | Circumferential reduction (%) | Number of treatments | BMI (kg/m2) | |
| Baseline (cm) | 4 wk post last treatment (cm) | |||||
| Thighs | 63 | 62.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 6 | 23 |
| 58 | 58 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 64 | 63.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | |||
| 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 56.7 | 54.2 | 2.5 | 4.6 | 3 | 25 | |
| 52.5 | 51.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 | |||
| 40.4 | 39 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 3 | 23 | |
| 40 | 39.4 | 0.6 | 1.5 | |||
| Abdomen | 94 | 90 | 4 | 4.4 | 6 | 23 |
| 71.5 | 71 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |||
| 92 | 90 | 2 | 2.2 | 4 | 27 | |
| 96 | 94 | 2 | 2.1 | |||
| 87 | 85 | 2 | 2.4 | |||
| 92 | 90.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 6 | 26 | |
| 93 | 95 | -2 | -2.1 | |||
| 87 | 86.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | |||
| 83 | 82 | 1 | 1.2 | 8 | 26 | |
| 91 | 87 | 4 | 4.6 | |||
| 101 | 95 | 6 | 6.3 | |||
| 112 | 100 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 31 | |
| 104 | 104 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 112 | 97 | 15 | 15.5 | 8 | 31 | |
| 104 | 96 | 8 | 8.3 | |||
| 92 | 89 | 3 | 3.4 | 5 | 27 | |
| 96 | 92.5 | 3.5 | 3.8 | |||
| 87 | 84 | 3 | 3.6 | |||
| Arms | 38 | 37 | 1 | 2.7 | 4 | 31 |
| 36 | 34 | 2 | 5.9 | |||
| 38 | 35 | 3 | 8.6 | 8 | 31 | |
| 36 | 38 | -2 | -5.3 | |||
| 35 | 34 | 1 | 2.9 | 4 | 31 | |
| 35 | 36 | -1 | -2.8 | |||
| 35 | 33.2 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 8 | 31 | |
| 35 | 34 | 1 | 2.9 | |||
- Citation: Tagger C, Belenky I. Multi-channeling optimized radiofrequency energy: A new age in well-established radiofrequency technology. World J Dermatol 2016; 5(4): 129-135
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6190/full/v5/i4/129.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5314/wjd.v5.i4.129