Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Anesthesiol. Mar 27, 2014; 3(1): 119-123
Published online Mar 27, 2014. doi: 10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119
Published online Mar 27, 2014. doi: 10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119
Figure 1 Three pumps compared.
A: On-Q pain pump; B: Baxter Multirate portable elastomeric infusion system; C: Ambu elastomeric infusion device.
Figure 2 Pump performance over time for three elastomeric portable infusion devices as noted by the title in each panel.
A: On-Q pain pump; B: Baxter Multirate portable elastomeric infusion system; C: Ambu elastomeric infusion device. Shown is the infusion rate in millilitres. The constant horizontal line represents the set nominal pump rate of 12 mL/h.
- Citation: LeRiger M, Bhalla T, Martin D, Bettesworth J, Tobias JD. Comparison of flow rate accuracy and consistency between the on-Q, baxter, and ambu pain infusion devices. World J Anesthesiol 2014; 3(1): 119-123
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6182/full/v3/i1/119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5313/wja.v3.i1.119