Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 10, 2017; 8(3): 266-272
Published online Jun 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.266
Table 1 Quality assessment of selected randomized clinical trials evaluated by Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool (Risk of bias per study)
CriteriaLangerPortierNordlingerYchouPrimrose
Random sequence generationUnclearLowLowLowLow
Allocation concealmentsLowLowLowLowLow
Blinding of participants and personnel1LowLowUnclearLowLow
Blinding of outcome assessment1,2LowLowLowLowLow
Incomplete outcome dataUnclearLowLowUnclearLow
Selective reportingLowLowLowLowLow
Other biasUnclearLowLowLowLow
Table 2 Comparative distribution of accessible baseline characteristics of patients among studies included in the systematic review
CharacteristicsLanger n = 107 (%)
Portier n = 171 (%)
Nordlinger n = 364 (%)
Ychou n = 306 (%)
Primrose1n = 257 (%)
Surg n = 55S + C n = 52Surg n = 85S + C n = 86Surg n = 182S + C n = 182S + 5-FU n = 153S + FOLFIRI n = 153S + C n = 128S + C + Cetuximab n = 129
Median age6063.56363626461636463
Gender (male)65.465.462.453.5637065.458.86371
Primary site (rectum)30.926.94040.7374626.128.8--
DFI ≤ 12 mo38.234.674.174.4242762.361.4--
Node-positive primary45.45050.644.35755----
No. of lesions > 132.736.530.131.4525135.936--
Largest met ≥ 5 cm----------
Chemotherapy5-FU5-FUFOLFOX5 –FUFOLFIRI5-FU + OX or 5-FU + Cap or FOLFIRI5-FU + OX or 5-FU + Cap or FOLFIRI or + Cetuximab
Table 3 Comparison of original planned and analyzed design of randomized clinical trials with patients who underwent surgery and additional chemotherapy for initially resectable colorectal liver metastases
StudiesInitial design
No. of patients
Chemotherapy
%Median FU
RFS
OS
by authorPrimary endpointPlanned HRType of analysesPlan-nedAcc-ruedITT enrolledPP (weight)RegimenStd ArmExp ArmResectedStd ArmExp ArmStd ArmExp ArmStd ArmExp Arm
LangerOSNRPPNR129129107 (9)Adj05-FU × 6100%NRNR203943 median53 median
PortierRFS20% abs dif 2 yr1ITT200173171171 (15)Adj05-FU × 6100%87.487.417.624.446.4 median62.1 median
Nord-lingerRFS0.714BothNR364364342 (29)Periop0FOLFOX × 1293%8.7 yr8.7 yr2012.554.361.3
YchouRFSNRPP420321321306 (26)Adj1 5FUFOLFIRI × 6100%42.441.721.624.772% at 3-yr73% at 3-yr
Pri-mroseRFS0.68ITT268272257236 (20)PeriopFOL-FOXCetux + FOLFOX (70%)85% (Chemo)21.119.814.120.539.1NR
82% (Cetux)
Table 4 Comparison of original hazard ratio and those from linear regression formula
Studies (by author)n total (weight %)RFS
OS
Assumption OS HR
HR95%CIHR95%CI
Langer107 (9)0.780.461.310.770.421.40.87
Portier171 (15)0.660.450.960.730.481.10.75
Nordlinger1342 (29)0.780.610.990.870.661.140.87
Ychou306 (26)0.890.661.191.090.721.640.97
Primrose236 (20)1.481.042.121.490.862.61.52