Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. May 10, 2013; 4(2): 52-57
Published online May 10, 2013. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v4.i2.52
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
Patients number
Sex
Male21 (65.6)
Female11 (34.4)
Comorbidities
Diabetes6 (18.7)
Alzheimer’s2 (6.3)
Hypertension15 (46.9)
Kaposi variant
Classic27 (84.3)
Iatrogenic5 (15.6)
Anatomic site
Limbs24 (75)
Limbs and trunk5 (15.6)
Scrotum1 (3.1 )
Glans1 (3.1 )
Lymph node involvement1 (3.1)
Number of lesions
10
20
30
> 332 (100)
Stage
Stage IIb18 (56.2)
Stage III-IV14 (43.7)
Table 2 Chemotherapy agents employed in the sample population n (%)
Patients number
Sytemic treatment1
Vinblastine17 (53.1)
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin8 (25)
Paclitaxel5 (15.6)
Gemcitabine1 (3.1)
Vinorelbine1 (3.1)
Overall number of lines of systemic treatment received by the patient
1 line26 (81.2)
> 1 line6 (18.8)
Table 3 Response to treatment n (%)
Response
Complete response4 (12.4)
Partial response10 (31.5)
Stable disease16 (50)
Progressive disease2 (6.2)
Progression-free survival, mo (range)11.7 (3-48)
Overall survival, mo (range)28.5 (12-48)
Table 4 Cox proportional hazard regression for progression-free survival
CharacteristicHazard ratio (95%CI)P value
Univariable
Stage (II vs III/IV)1.63 (0.74-3.57)0.22
Cutaneous lesion (macules vs nodules)3.09 (1.18-8.13)0.01
Extent (lower limb only vs other parts of the body)1.61 (0.72-3.59)0.24
Symptoms (no vs yes)0.72 (0.32-1.62)0.44
Age0.97 (0.93-1.01)0.16
Sex (female vs male)0.73 (0.32-1.69)0.47
Multivariable
Cutaneous lesion (nodular/papular/macules vs macules only)3.09 (1.18-8.13)0.013