Interconversion of two commonly used performance tools: An analysis of 5844 paired assessments in 1501 lung cancer patients

Table 1 Karnofsky performance status categories suggested for interconversion to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in the literature

Author, year	n and patients, assessments	Setting	KPS categories	ECOG
AJCC[34], 1977	-	-	90-100	0
			70-80	1
			50-60	2
			30-40	3
			10-20	4
Minna et al[20], 1985	-	-	100	0
			80-90	1
			60-70	2
			40-50	3
			20-30	4
Buccheri et al[10], 1996	536 (1656)	Subjects with lung cancer visiting a cancer clinic of a tertiary care centre	80-100	0-1
			60-70	2
			10-50	3-4
Ma et al[19], 2010	1385 (1385)	Subjects visiting an oncology palliative care clinic, or admitted to an acute cancer palliative care unit	100	0
			80-90	1
			60-70	2
			40-50	3
			10-30	4
de Kock et al[18], 2013	955 (674)	Subjects with advanced life-limiting illnesses (cancer and non-cancer) in acute care and community settings	60-100	1
			50	2
			30-40	3
			10-20	4
Current study	1501 (5844)	Subjects with lung cancer visiting a cancer clinic of a tertiary care center	100	0
			80-90	1
			70	2
			50-60	3
			10-40	4

AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; KPS: Karnofsky performance status; PS: Performance status.