A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

doi:10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 4

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6071)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

418

HTML

5257

Figures (1-2)

239

Tables (1-4)

157

Sum=6071

Apr 10, 2012 (publication date) through Jun 11, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (34)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Oncology

ISSN

2218-4333

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Clin Oncol. Apr 10, 2012; 3(4): 57-62
Published online Apr 10, 2012. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Example plan evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy vs volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy for patient No. 18. The volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy plan (right) had dose that wrapped around the spinal cord despite an avoidance structure. The corresponding intensity modulated radiation therapy plan (left) did not.

Citation: Fung-Kee-Fung SD, Hackett R, Hales L, Warren G, Singh AK. A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2012; 3(4): 57-62
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v3/i4/57.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57