Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2026; 17(7): 123983
Published online Jul 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123983
Published online Jul 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123983
Table 7 Relationship between financial toxicity grade and treatment adherence, mean ± SD
| Financial toxicity score grade | Number of patients | Percentage (%) | Average MMAS-8 score | Proportion with poor adherence (%) |
| 0-10 points (low toxicity) | 18 | 17.5 | 5.42 ± 1.23 | 22.2 |
| 11-20 points (moderate toxicity) | 47 | 45.6 | 4.18 ± 1.45 | 48.9 |
| 21-30 points (high toxicity) | 29 | 28.2 | 3.25 ± 1.68 | 75.9 |
| > 30 points (severe toxicity) | 9 | 8.7 | 2.18 ± 1.32 | 88.9 |
- Citation: Ran LH, Qin CC. Cross-sectional survey of factors influencing treatment adherence in elderly cancer patients in rural mountainous Guangyuan, China. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 123983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i7/123983.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123983