BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2026; 17(6): 118209
Published online Jun 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.118209
Table 2 Summary of “randomized disappointments” with immunotherapy in unselected glioblastoma
Ref.
n
Trial number
Phase
Patient population
Design
Results
Reardon et al[35]369NCT02017717 Checkmate 143Phase 3 RCTRecurrent GBMNivolumab vs bevacizumabmPFS 1.5 months vs 3.5 months, mOS 9.8 months vs 10 months, ORR 7.8% vs 23.1%
Nayak et al[32]80NCT02337491Phase 2 RCTRecurrent GBMPembrolizumab + bevacizumab vs pembrolizumabPFS6 rate 26% vs 6.7%; mOS 8.8 months vs 10.3 months; ORR 20% vs 0%
Iwamoto et al[33] 60NCT03661723Phase 2 RCTRecurrent GBMPembrolizumab + ReRT (bevacizumab naïve) vs bevacizumab continuationmPFS 4 months each; mOS 11 months vs 7 months
Lim et al[36] 716NCT02667587 CheckMate 548Phase 3 RCTNewly diagnosed GBM, MGMT methylatedNivolumab + RT + TMZ vs placebo + RT + TMZmPFS 10.6 months vs 10.3 months; mOS 28.9 months vs 32.1 months
Omuro et al[37]560NCT02617589 CheckMate 498Phase 3 RCTNewly diagnosed GBM, MGMT unmethylatedNivolumab + RT vs TMZ + RTmPFS 6.0 months vs 6.2 months; mOS 13.4 months vs 14.9 months
Lassman et al[38]159NCT04396860 NRG Oncology BN007Phase 2 RCTNewly diagnosed GBM, MGMT unmethylatedNivolumab + ipilimumab + RT vs TMZ + RTmPFS 7.7 months vs 8.5 months; OS immature (approximately 13 months each)
Brown et al[39]119ISRCTN84434175 Ipi-Glio trialPhase 2 RCTNewly diagnosed GBMIpilimumab + TMZ vs TMZmPFS 10.8 months vs 12.5 months; mOS months 18.0 vs 23.0 months


Write to the Help Desk